I've always been a supported of Holistic Medicine and was always a proponent of Acupuncture. After all, just a decade ago it was never covered by insurance, and people were paying thousands to get it done with great relief.But then I read an analysis from a study in Germany that came out in 2007. The analysis studied over 30,00 college students and yielded worrisome results.. The certain "spots" where a needle goes for acupuncture was given to one group, while another group was randomly poked. Princeton caught on to this first major analysis and yielded that Acupuncture was successful, but for one reason; placebo. They claimed that it was due to a fascination with eastern medicine and a trust in efficiency that made it seem so successful.I have held this unfortunate view since I read about it, but the tide has turned. An article in 2009 by The New England Journal seems to produce some promising data on acupuncture. While this article is actually the one that made me question acupuncture in the first place, my pain management doctor told me to re-read it and re-conceptualize. To sum up what Berman et al. said, it is effective, be it placebo or not, though he didn't use the word.
However, since extensive clinical trials have suggested that acupuncture may be more effective than usual care, it is not unreasonable to consider acupuncture before or together with conventional treatments, such as physical therapy, pain medication, and exercise. Many pain specialists incorporate acupuncture into a multidisciplinary approach to the management of chronic low back pain.
As noted above, the most recent well-powered clinical trials of acupuncture for chronic low back pain showed that sham acupuncture was as effective as real acupuncture. The simplest explanation of such findings is that the specific therapeutic effects of acupuncture, if present, are small, whereas its clinically relevant benefits are mostly attributable to contextual and psychosocial factors, such as patients’ beliefs and expectations, attention from the acupuncturist, and highly focused, spatially directed attention on the part of the patient. These studies also seem to indicate that needles do not need to stimulate the traditionally identified acupuncture points or actually penetrate the skin to produce the anticipated effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment